|
Post by XDXDXDXDXD on Feb 11, 2014 1:47:57 GMT
VĂdeo: nfstimes.com/nfsw/pc/JANOGT1/times Overall: 399 Nivel 60 Time: 1 59 22 Is that an FPS counter at the top right? If yes, ladies and gentleman, we have a cheater busted as it is a common knowledge, that in this game you get a lot better performance when you have way over 60FPS and you are about 1s naturally slower for every minute of the track if you have low FPS (around 30fps). Don't want to sound like a jerk, the run was amazing, that is obvious, but if those are FPS then sorry, you can't shave 2 seconds out of 1:59 time, which at below 30FPS would be 2:01 time naturally. hahaha I do not know if you are newbie or not see my video ... Do you know how long it took me to make that time? It took me two hours ... I think you need buying a good friend lenses!
|
|
|
Post by andsoclean on Feb 11, 2014 2:06:41 GMT
Increased FPS does not mean increased performance. Having better FPS makes it easier to do better times, but it does not directly effect the speed of the game. I know in Rivals when it was first released that increasing the FPS increased the speed of the game - But that is definitely NOT the case in World. I've had it running at 100 FPS before and it made no difference. I consistently run at 85 FPS now, simply to provide a 'buffer zone' for when the FPS drops (hoping that when it does drop, it doesn't go below 60 FPS and become noticeable to my eyes).
HOWEVER - The 'speed bug' happens when the game falls out of sync because of memory issues (same thing for the 'slow bug', just those unlucky people get the reverse effect). JANOGT1 seems to have a slower computer, so it is possible that he runs in to the speed bug more often since memory issues will be more prevalent in a slower computer. He's not the first and will not be the last member on this board to get great times with the speed bug.
|
|
|
Post by Chandrian on Feb 11, 2014 2:41:40 GMT
Is that an FPS counter at the top right? If yes, ladies and gentleman, we have a cheater busted as it is a common knowledge, that in this game you get a lot better performance when you have way over 60FPS and you are about 1s naturally slower for every minute of the track if you have low FPS (around 30fps). Don't want to sound like a jerk, the run was amazing, that is obvious, but if those are FPS then sorry, you can't shave 2 seconds out of 1:59 time, which at below 30FPS would be 2:01 time naturally. I think that recording program works different. It shows the fps the recorded video is being processed at, not the fps your game is running at, which is totally different; dxtory works that way, for example. The program is called mirillis action. XDXDXDXDXD fix your entry format.
|
|
|
Post by XDXDXDXDXD on Feb 11, 2014 3:01:58 GMT
Increased FPS does not mean increased performance. Having better FPS makes it easier to do better times, but it does not directly effect the speed of the game. I know in Rivals when it was first released that increasing the FPS increased the speed of the game - But that is definitely NOT the case in World. I've had it running at 100 FPS before and it made no difference. I consistently run at 85 FPS now, simply to provide a 'buffer zone' for when the FPS drops (hoping that when it does drop, it doesn't go below 60 FPS and become noticeable to my eyes). HOWEVER - The 'speed bug' happens when the game falls out of sync because of memory issues (same thing for the 'slow bug', just those unlucky people get the reverse effect). JANOGT1 seems to have a slower computer, so it is possible that he runs in to the speed bug more often since memory issues will be more prevalent in a slower computer. He's not the first and will not be the last member on this board to get great times with the speed bug. I do not use speedbug, at this time in the pc I am, if indeed it is a bit slow, but is passable, I can record almost "no lag". In some parts of lagea ugly. Also, my videos on my youtube channel (recent) are done with this pc: Amd athlon x2 2.8Ghz (2 processors) Ddr3 2gb ram Nvidia 256mb ... the other videos that are older (3 weeks old onwards) are made ​​with my Ultrabook that there could record at 30-50fps ... without lag. Also, I do not do bugs times, I have many times in my youtube channel with task manager. Unfortunately in this pc (2.8ghz) I can not record with task manager because if I record with Windows Aero, the game lagea me much. However without the aero, I can play "humbly" however, to play a few FPS is not going to indicate that use "speedbug". It's my opinion. I do not use speedbug. Good Night!
|
|
|
Post by DerpyMail on Feb 11, 2014 3:28:21 GMT
Well, bored of trying with those awful lags, I'll keep that decent time lol.
Also, Jano... you cannot trigger the speedbug on purpose, it often happen when you are playing for a long time. And you said you played for two hours, so it's very probable that you triggered it. While you easily reached 173km/h at the beggining climbing that hill, I could barely do 168km/h. So it's either a speedbug or you hack, and I hope it's the first one.
2:02:177 - DERPYMAIL - Chevrolet Cobalt SS - 399 - 60 nfstimes.com/nfsw/pc/DERPYMAIL
|
|
|
Post by tulsinjoin on Feb 11, 2014 3:49:30 GMT
I know jano and is a clean player, time is possible
|
|
|
Post by GustavoAP on Feb 11, 2014 4:05:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by FasterthaMyou on Feb 11, 2014 5:13:48 GMT
|
|
tencha
ISRC Junior Member
Pura Vida. Costa Rica. UTD member
Posts: 197
|
Post by tencha on Feb 11, 2014 5:19:28 GMT
2:02:177 - DERPYMAIL - Chevrolet Cobalt SS - 399 - 60 U missed this after the confirmation line nfstimes.com/nfsw/pc/DERPYMAILI will try, i'm doing this track with Lexus IS350(is ok in D but still a slow car) in a alt driver to get wins, maybe when i use Cobalt will do faster
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2014 7:07:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LamboGTR on Feb 11, 2014 11:53:22 GMT
While you easily reached 173km/h at the beggining climbing that hill, I could barely do 168km/h. So it's either a speedbug or you hack, and I hope it's the first one. But I did 175kph at the top of the hill. FasterthaMyou I'll give it a try.
|
|
|
Post by Jussi on Feb 11, 2014 13:19:51 GMT
Any one want to test the difference between Super Bee (original) and Super Bee Juggernaut? Jussi
|
|
|
Post by Chandrian on Feb 11, 2014 13:24:50 GMT
Any one want to test the difference between Super Bee (original) and Super Bee Juggernaut? Jussi well if you give me a code for both cars... sure xD
|
|
Ryu Makkuro
ISRC Recruit
Powered by DragonForce
Posts: 23
|
Post by Ryu Makkuro on Feb 11, 2014 13:34:21 GMT
hahaha I do not know if you are newbie or not see my video ... Do you know how long it took me to make that time? It took me two hours ... I think you need buying a good friend lenses! And you need to learn some people are experienced enough to know what is possible and what's not. Your run was perfect, that is true, but mine was as well. And since you play at those FPS, going below 2:00 mark is impossible, due to the simple fact that the game makes you slower. Increased FPS does not mean increased performance. Having better FPS makes it easier to do better times, but it does not directly effect the speed of the game. I know in Rivals when it was first released that increasing the FPS increased the speed of the game - But that is definitely NOT the case in World. I've had it running at 100 FPS before and it made no difference. I consistently run at 85 FPS now, simply to provide a 'buffer zone' for when the FPS drops (hoping that when it does drop, it doesn't go below 60 FPS and become noticeable to my eyes). HOWEVER - The 'speed bug' happens when the game falls out of sync because of memory issues (same thing for the 'slow bug', just those unlucky people get the reverse effect). JANOGT1 seems to have a slower computer, so it is possible that he runs in to the speed bug more often since memory issues will be more prevalent in a slower computer. He's not the first and will not be the last member on this board to get great times with the speed bug. Increased FPS, or rather FPS over 60 does mean increased performance. Simple test is enough, automatic gear box with the same car on Turnpike. Do runs at 30FPS and then at 80+ FPS and you'll see that there will be a difference in times. As I said, in a 1 minute track that is not top speed based, it's about 1 second slower time. There's nothing you can do about it, game does make put out actual performance only when you're above 60FPS. When you are below you have worse performance. Like an FPS slowbug or something. I think that recording program works different. It shows the fps the recorded video is being processed at, not the fps your game is running at, which is totally different; dxtory works that way, for example. The program is called mirillis action. I know about that very well, thus it has TWO FPS counter, one shows Video framerate and second actual FPS in-game, both of which show below 30FPS. I am a YouTuber and I have used my fair amount of recording programs so I do know my way around with them. I know jano and is a clean player, time is possible That coming from you makes him even less reliable -.- And before someone starts saying "jealous", "crybaby" and so on, I joined not for rewards, but for fun, fair play and competition. So when I see a cheater I simply inform about it. I don't accuse people of cheating because "I want to win", but because they actually cheat. I could care less if someone would beat me, I would actually be happy, but not when someone does that in a cheating way. You may say I come here and say who cheats and who not, but I did experience few times already what it means to be fooled by your so called "friends", thus I don't believe in explanations like "he's my friend, we always race and he is beatable", cause when you don't race with each other, those people start to cheat. And it so happens I find some of them while they are doing it. Anyway, this will most likely be my last post here, seems that my presence is like a magnet for cheaters -.-
|
|
|
Post by andsoclean on Feb 11, 2014 14:09:33 GMT
Also, I do not do bugs times, I have many times in my youtube channel with task manager. Unfortunately in this pc (2.8ghz) I can not record with task manager because if I record with Windows Aero, the game lagea me much. However without the aero, I can play "humbly" however, to play a few FPS is not going to indicate that use "speedbug". It's my opinion. I do not use speedbug. Good Night! I was not saying you definitely used the speedbug. Also, Jano... you cannot trigger the speedbug on purpose, it often happen when you are playing for a long time. And you said you played for two hours, so it's very probable that you triggered it. While you easily reached 173km/h at the beggining climbing that hill, I could barely do 168km/h. So it's either a speedbug or you hack, and I hope it's the first one. The speedbug does NOT effect the 'speed' (MPH/KPH) of the cars within the game. It happens when the game processes faster than it should - When a memory issue causes the game to fall out of sync. Increased FPS, or rather FPS over 60 does mean increased performance. Simple test is enough, automatic gear box with the same car on Turnpike. Do runs at 30FPS and then at 80+ FPS and you'll see that there will be a difference in times. As I said, in a 1 minute track that is not top speed based, it's about 1 second slower time. There's nothing you can do about it, game does make put out actual performance only when you're above 60FPS. When you are below you have worse performance. Like an FPS slowbug or something. I just tested this and it did not work that way (for me). I actually had a faster time setting my FPS to 30. The only way this can happen is if the game cannot process quick enough, rendering is a completely different story. So while this may be true for certain setups, specifically saying lower FPS means slower times, is not always true.
|
|