|
Post by nevermemos on Dec 13, 2013 17:48:20 GMT
1st lap you got lucky on jumps, for some reason my car screws these jumps and loose so much speed that i can't do a proper jumpw on the bridge
|
|
|
Post by malikhussain on Dec 13, 2013 21:13:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Chandrian on Dec 13, 2013 23:27:34 GMT
Just got 3:17.35 with my Zonda F, I think I'll be able to pull off a 3:16.xx, wonder what's the limit of a really good driver with that car, 3:15.xx?
|
|
|
Post by LamboGTR on Dec 14, 2013 1:08:42 GMT
Just got 3:17.35 with my Zonda F, I think I'll be able to pull off a 3:16.xx, wonder what's the limit of a really good driver with that car, 3:15.xx? I'll give it a try. I think 3:16 would be best.
|
|
|
Post by Paragleiber on Dec 14, 2013 3:16:14 GMT
Damn, I do a clean run with my fully orange Ultra tuned Zonda Cinque, which is a 3:26. Then I come here and see that people are doing 3:1x with Zonda F and Agera. It seems I really don't understand this game. Then again I am top 1% overall on nfstimes and I am even still missing a few tracks there. I guess these races here are only for the top 0.2% or something. Or at least most of the participants seem to come from that group. And for some reason these few people seem to know something very significant about driving the cars in NFS World that all the "normal people" don't. You can also see that on nfstimes. Isn't it odd that for example on this track the difference between #1 and #100 on nfstimes is 16 seconds but between #100 and #1000 it is 15? Normally I would expect that the differences get smaller at the top because it is only about perfection there but instead the very best are many seconds faster than the ones who are "only" top 1%. It doesn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by nevermemos on Dec 14, 2013 8:00:20 GMT
Damn, I do a clean run with my fully orange Ultra tuned Zonda Cinque, which is a 3:26. Then I come here and see that people are doing 3:1x with Zonda F and Agera. It seems I really don't understand this game. Then again I am top 1% overall on nfstimes and I am even still missing a few tracks there. I guess these races here are only for the top 0.2% or something. Or at least most of the participants seem to come from that group. And for some reason these few people seem to know something very significant about driving the cars in NFS World that all the "normal people" don't. You can also see that on nfstimes. Isn't it odd that for example on this track the difference between #1 and #100 on nfstimes is 16 seconds but between #100 and #1000 it is 15? Normally I would expect that the differences get smaller at the top because it is only about perfection there but instead the very best are many seconds faster than the ones who are "only" top 1%. It doesn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by whiskeyandcola on Dec 14, 2013 13:52:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dejanboskov on Dec 14, 2013 20:50:19 GMT
The start is very hard here it's so tight there is no room 4 maneuver here but the second lap is fine. 03:36.863 - dejanboskov - Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0 - 798 - 60 nfstimes.com/nfsw/pc/DEJANBOSKOV/times
|
|
|
Post by thejanflink on Dec 15, 2013 0:49:28 GMT
|
|
tencha
ISRC Junior Member
Pura Vida. Costa Rica. UTD member
Posts: 197
|
Post by tencha on Dec 15, 2013 3:07:19 GMT
|
|
DENghini
ISRC Senior Member
twitch.tv/denghini
Posts: 303
|
Post by DENghini on Dec 15, 2013 4:43:02 GMT
|
|
MIB
ISRC Recruit
Posts: 29
|
Post by MIB on Dec 15, 2013 11:24:14 GMT
|
|
nekholu
ISRC Junior Member
Posts: 166
|
Post by nekholu on Dec 15, 2013 12:50:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thejanflink on Dec 15, 2013 13:27:54 GMT
Just got 3:17.35 with my Zonda F, I think I'll be able to pull off a 3:16.xx, wonder what's the limit of a really good driver with that car, 3:15.xx? I'll give it a try. I think 3:16 would be best. I did 3:15.753 with Zonda F
|
|
|
Post by Radeg10 on Dec 15, 2013 15:19:03 GMT
What is better choice here? Porshe Carrera GT Ultra or Veyron with ultra parts?
|
|