swoos
ISRC Senior Member
Posts: 306
|
Post by swoos on Sept 2, 2012 20:56:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by abdmaster on Sept 2, 2012 21:08:33 GMT
B class ccx are you sure? Yes, because the stock rating of CCX "ELITE" is only 593... I guess this much answers why its is the top of B Class. But if we remove this car, then MR2, Eclipse ELITE, RX8 are in the top. Still I need to see how Exige, Elise does when its rated 598.
|
|
DJxASHx
ISRC Junior Member
Posts: 151
|
Post by DJxASHx on Sept 2, 2012 21:17:16 GMT
|
|
thebigman06
ISRC Member
If you see someone, who doesnt smile, give him yours.
Posts: 259
|
Post by thebigman06 on Sept 2, 2012 22:15:57 GMT
my try with my 2nd account on chicane server: 2:28:10 - THEBIGMAN06 (driven with FLAMEDPHOENIX) - Camaro SS '69 - 397 - lvl 50 nfsc-s.com/nfsw/FLAMEDPHOENIXand of course a new bug.. says 399 OA rating and D-class, but in fact in counts as C-class, so i had to deinstall the 001 brake which also gave me acceleration and topspeed.. lol..
|
|
|
Post by ZAKITLB on Sept 2, 2012 22:19:55 GMT
|
|
time2rest
ISRC Senior Member
Race Hard, Have Fun, and don't forget to Live your Life!! :)
Posts: 327
|
Post by time2rest on Sept 2, 2012 22:39:46 GMT
|
|
swoos
ISRC Senior Member
Posts: 306
|
Post by swoos on Sept 2, 2012 23:07:56 GMT
B class ccx are you sure? Yes, because the stock rating of CCX "ELITE" is only 593... I guess this much answers why its is the top of B Class. But if we remove this car, then MR2, Eclipse ELITE, RX8 are in the top. Still I need to see how Exige, Elise does when its rated 598. beh its the ELITE one, normal one is way above that in stock :/
|
|
|
Post by Jussi on Sept 17, 2012 13:15:43 GMT
RACE OVER!Collected results: # | TIME | DRIVER | CAR | OA | LVL ---+----------+----------------+--------------------+-----+---- 1 | 2:24.981 | LIBYA | Toyota MR2 | 398 | 50 2 | 2:25.74 | mihxser | Toyota MR2 | 398 | 50 3 | 2:28:10 | THEBIGMAN06 | Chevy Camaro SS | 397 | 50 4 | 2:28.219 | GREEN26 | Nissan Silvia S15 | 397 | 50 5 | 2:29.364 | ABDMASTER | Toyota Corolla GTS | 398 | 50 6 | 2:30.024 | SWOOS | Toyota Corolla GTS | 398 | 50 7 | 2:32.63 | FURSTIC | Toyota Corolla GTS | 398 | 50 8 | 2:32.799 | BUMBILEK3 | Nissan Silvia S15 | 380 | 40 9 | 2:33.01 | KAJAMAC | Toyota MR2 | 398 | 50 10 | 2:34.625 | CoolJUST | Nissan 200SX (S14) | 398 | 38 11 | 2:37.52 | YUUFA4LIV | Toyota MR2 | 360 | 50 12 | 2:38.443 | JUSSI | Toyota Corolla GTS | 399 | 50 13 | 2:40.494 | ZAKITALBI | Chevy Camaro SS | 395 | 21 The times that are missing the last digit could not be verified from leaderboards. Jussi PS. Please point out any errors.
|
|
|
Post by Jussi on Sept 26, 2012 18:45:54 GMT
I came up with a new way of determining the best racer for our next series. What do you think? Spreadsheet: dl.dropbox.com/u/69028976/NFSW/class_series_beta.xlsThis example calculates the average performance percentage and recognizes the best performance percentage. Racers are then put into order by the best performance percentage first and average is used, if two or more racers have same exact best performance percentage. Now the example uses races from our first car class weekend, but in the series best performance percentages would be recognized per class and then then an average would be calculated from those. So basically you get several attempts to get the best result for each class and only your best result for each class will count toward the end result. Jussi
|
|